Bicycle Electric Motors – Brushless vs. Brushed

Firstly], it should be understood that a conflict between brushed & brushless electric motor technologies had been a long-standing old trope, before the modern electric bicycle arrived on the scene. This is an old argument.

Thus, the argument (or trope) actually came into being in the relative primeval mists of electrical-technology evolution. It’s a bit like the argument whether gasoline or diesel engines are better … 20 or 40 or 80 and more years ago, the facts & particulars in play were different. The hot quiz-tip here is (as in many other technology contexts) that each type of motor has its advantages & disadvantages, strengths & weaknesses, limitations & potential.  Utility brushed motors are handier, for example, if you are going to drive a homemade electric bicycle through the normal chain-gears, which is an inexpensive route.  Hub-motors are obviously made to be integrated into the hub, and it’s going to be a big hassle to use them any other way.  By using sprockets & chain, you can have lots of gears, which give optimum performance under a wide range of conditions, and can do it with a lower-power motor.

Brushes for electric motor commutation are today often posed as a reliability problem. Long ago, brushes wore out fast, and if not caught in time, the steel brush-holder could damage the commutator segments (which in practical terms means a motor-replacement). These problems were largely resolved, by your great-Grandpa. Today, ‘what it is’, is that brushed motors are the (much) less costly solution, and therefore market-forces sometimes create a ‘race to the bottom’, in which some specific manufactured units might be junk. But this does not appear to be a problem with bike-motors, and in particular does not appear to be a big hazard with motors intended or selected for bicycle service.

Brushes are replaceable. Because of computerized inventory & cross-referencing, virtually any brush on any motor anywhere in the world can be identified and replacements obtained, inexpensively. Now, if brush-failure has been extensive, and ignored for a long time (there is arcing, sparking & electrical burning-odors that make it obvious there is a problem), then yeah there is the possibility of  commutator-damage which is not worth fixing on ordinary small motors.

Younger folks today may not know that in times not far past, electric motor repair shops where the norm in every 3-horse town in the nation. They are still common in larger population centers. The main reason these shops thrive, is that electric motors are fundamentally unchallenging technology, and everything about them can be addressed with modest investment, tooling & education. They are physically simple & manageable … FAR simpler & easier, than even a lawn-mower engine, much less car-engines.

Brushes at one time tended to wear out fast, because they were formulated to be soft and lubricating, even at the cost of reduced conductivity and increased resistance-loses.  But the reason for this type of brush was mainly to spare wear of the critical copper commutater segments.  Today, commutator bars are made of improved copper alloys which both improved wear-resistance and gives them better lubricating properties.  Thus, brushes in turn can be made with better wear-characteristics, and do not need the lubricity that interfered with their electrical performance.

Brushes tend to wear excessively, under overload conditions.  DC motors especially are

Soybean Taboo if you grow food, or minimize nonsense...

Soybean Taboo was noticeable to average people in the American sphere, no later than the early 1970s. (This will likely prove to be the case in Europe, too.)  Especially the processed protein component (aka TVP Textured Vegetable Protein) that becomes available (and even a disposal problem) following grinding for the more-valuable oil-component (and its attendant solvent-extraction).  Notice that, irrationally, the oil itself, which is the object of the processing (and main value in the bean), generates less concern than the protein, which is a by-product and only incidentally involved.

Soybean is the best source of complete, balanced amino-acid protein in the plant-world.  By far.  Animal-nutrition science tells us that soy is not desirable as a staple food-base;  you should not try to ‘live on it’, alone.  Like other beans, there is a limit to how much of it a critter is going to be interested in eating.  But well within the optimum range, soy is a dramatic protein-supplement, within a primarily plant-based (and thus, protein-challenged) diet.  Soy grows readily in the home garden.  So there is real value, at the personal level, in understanding the taboo.

The demonization of soybean is seen in the 1973 dystopian science-fiction movie, Soylent Green, which was based on a book written in 1966.  The bean itself was essential innocent in the story … the soybean-lentil food-product (Soylent) was secretly fortified (by the evil government) with ground-up human bodies, and it was this source of added-supplement that consumers supposed found irresistibly, insanely delicious.  Indeed, any added animal-fat & protein supplementation of a purely plant-based feed-ration will improve its palatability (and nutritional value) … both for livestock and for humans too.

Soy contains a substance known to chemists as an isoflavone, which bear a degree of chemical resemblance to the hormone estrogen.  That isoflavones ever produce any estrogen-effect in animals lacks good or credible scientific support (and it would big-time ‘Big Pharma’ valuable & exploitable, if it did).  Nonetheless, we now have the synonym term Phytoestrogen,  specially emphasizing a ‘useful implication’ that these substances have hormone-activity.  (Thus supposedly, eg, forcing female children into early puberty, and promoting undesirable changes in both younger & older males.)

More-generally, in-general, humans & other animals cannot readily obtain homone-activity by eating a hormone, because hormones are proteins, and as such they are simply digested along with any other protein that is ingested.  All that one gets from eating hormone-molecules, is the generic amino acids.  Animals – and humans – do not directly utilize proteins that are in their diet, but instead must break them down into amino acids, absorb those, and then build new proteins internally, from the amino acids.  Still, the movement to identify isoflavones as dangerous (and their presence in food products as unhealthful at best, and nefarious or diabolical at worst) appears to be experiencing positive growth.

Cooking coagulates proteins (and makes them more-digestible).  Proteins that have been denatured in this way or in other ways, no longer have the properties that they  possessed in the active, unmodified form.  Hormone-molecules that have been coagulated or otherwise denatured, no longer have any potential to play a hormone-role.  They’re cooked.

Premarine, or PREMARINE, is the usual pharmaceutical supply of estrogen for humans.  The word Premarine derives from the source, which is Pregnant Mare Urine. The context & conditions under which the raw material is obtained is distinctly unattractive at best, and by some standards, more or less ethically objectionable. If we could get a useable estrogen-supplement starting-base from soybeans or other plants, it would be a good thing, and a whole lot less hassle & expense than getting it from horse-pee.  Hmm?

Oil is extracted from ground soybeans, using the hydrocarbon solvent hexane, which is a main component of the hydrocarbon-mixture known as gasoline.  Hexane was chosen for this process, in part because it is easy to remove, after it has served its role as a solvent in the recovery of the soybean oil.  Standards and testing for removal of the hexane are high.  Hexane, along with other hydrocarbons, is found in many natural foods, such as citrus and other fruits, filbert nuts, various mushrooms, etc.  Solvent-abuse (huffing gasoline) delivers very large doses, yet acute toxicity of hexane is not easily identified.  Long-term solvent huffing & sniffing results in damage to the patient, but it is not clear what the role of hexane is here, if any.

Solvent-extraction is very widespread & fundmental technology, throughout the food industry, using hexane either alone or more commonly in conjunction with other solvents.  The whole, unprocessed bean has not been subjected to any solvent process, and is completely free of any associated concerns.

Scientific Naming Follies

Scientific Naming Follies is one of an ecosystem of systemic social & psychological diseases of the institution of science, and its associated individual temperaments.

Lumpers vs Spltters is the old term for a high-profile struggle that marred earlier stages of Science. Some workers thought variations on a theme of animal or plant species (and other classes of objects of curiosity) should be lumped-together under a common name. Other workers disagreed, feeling that it was better to divide (split) natural groupings into larger numbers of species … as long as some distinction can be discerned … irregardless at times of the fundamental or superficial nature of apparent differences.

Edible Pod (Rat Tail) Radish hyper-productive, tender, mild-flavored, nutritious vegetable

Edible Pod Radish makes an enlarged, succulent, crunchy pod, in the same fashion as green-beans and snap-peas. The tip of the pod tapers to a fine point, giving it a fanciful resemblance to a rat-tail … a name by which it was formerly found in seed-catalogs etc, but is now not often seen.

Seed-pod vegetables are naturally young, and are grown as part of the reproduction cycle, so are a spare-no-expense plant-function.  Tradtionally, green-beans became a staple veggie of common rural families.  Typically, the act of picking the immature pods actively stimulates to plant to set more flowers, and pods.

Technically a fruit, like tomatoes and cucumbers, they are treated as a vegetable.

Radishes have a natural tendency to Bolt to Seed.  This family of garden plants is anxious to flower and set seed.  With the familiar radishes grown for the root, this is a problem.  With radishes grown for an edible pod, the bolting-habit works in our favor.

Cretaceous-Tertiary, Paleogene Confusion

The term Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T), for the boundary or transition between those two geological periods, has been in use for many generations. Then one day it was unilaterally decreed, by an unelected, unaccountable and generally unknown entity or person (a Professor, or group of them), that henceforth everyone should use the term Cretaceous-Paleogene, instead.

This is yet-another case of the Scientific Naming Follies. In this case it is notably unfortunate for science, since the general public has a high level of interest in Dinosaurs,  and know that their extinction occured at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary.

Neither Tertiary nor Paleogene are ‘good’ names: one means ‘third’, and the other means ‘old’. That makes them – technically – “dumb” names. Dumb in the literal sense that as names, they say or tell us nothing.

Genealogy & Pedigree for Plants curious relations of photosynthetic organisms

Pedigree of Canadice Grape, bred by NY Cornell U in 1977

Genealogy for Plants cannot readily be done with the same software that we use for human families (and which can be used for other animals, though perhaps with difficulties), for two reasons.

One, many plants are self-fertile.  There are flexible and variable versions of this, such as with apple trees which may require a pollinator-variety, or may bear fruit by themselves.  Conversely, other plants like peas, tomatoes and cereal grains, normally fertilize themselves and are not cross-pollinated at all. … cont’d >